| | 2011 League Owner Agreement |  |
|
+9Ironhorse4 Kat nickalero99 Zara Timmah GBpig99 bohman Skoodog Rotoraysfan 13 posters |
| Author | Message |
|---|
Rotoraysfan
Posts : 256
Join date : 2011-01-12
| | Subject: 2011 League Owner Agreement Wed Jan 12, 2011 2:18 pm | |
| I will ask that all owners confirm they have reviewed the rules & settings for the 2011 season, and post "I agree" here.
I agree. | |
|
| | |
Skoodog
Posts : 47
Join date : 2011-01-12
| | Subject: Re: 2011 League Owner Agreement Wed Jan 12, 2011 7:51 pm | |
| I agree - and i'm going to steal this for my league. | |
|
| | |
bohman
Posts : 57
Join date : 2011-01-12
| | Subject: Re: 2011 League Owner Agreement Thu Jan 13, 2011 8:22 am | |
| Great job with the rules, John.
I agree! | |
|
| | |
GBpig99
Posts : 58
Join date : 2011-01-13
| | Subject: Re: 2011 League Owner Agreement Sun Jan 16, 2011 12:36 am | |
| I agree although I don't support being in a league with Skoodog. | |
|
| | |
Timmah
Posts : 62
Join date : 2011-01-16
Location : Philadelphia
| | Subject: Re: 2011 League Owner Agreement Sun Jan 16, 2011 2:33 pm | |
| | |
|
| | |
Zara
Posts : 48
Join date : 2011-01-12
| | Subject: Re: 2011 League Owner Agreement Wed Feb 02, 2011 9:15 am | |
| | |
|
| | |
nickalero99
Posts : 32
Join date : 2011-01-12
| | Subject: Re: 2011 League Owner Agreement Wed Feb 02, 2011 6:52 pm | |
| | |
|
| | |
Kat
Posts : 2
Join date : 2011-02-12
| | Subject: Dog & Kat Agreement Sat Feb 12, 2011 3:06 pm | |
| | |
|
| | |
Ironhorse4
Posts : 6
Join date : 2011-01-18
| | Subject: Agreement Tue Feb 15, 2011 2:46 pm | |
| | |
|
| | |
Patrick Bateman
Posts : 88
Join date : 2011-02-02
| | Subject: Re: 2011 League Owner Agreement Tue Feb 15, 2011 3:52 pm | |
| 2 Catchers is a bit weird, but okay.
| |
|
| | |
The Czar
Posts : 35
Join date : 2011-01-13
| | Subject: Re: 2011 League Owner Agreement Wed Feb 16, 2011 2:34 am | |
| 2 Catchers? Is this Zara's idea because his other league is catcher challenged and won't let him have a second one? Fetish for squatting men? I could do without the second man in the tools of ignorance myself.
Other than that, I've read the rules and I agree.
| |
|
| | |
Rotoraysfan
Posts : 256
Join date : 2011-01-12
| | Subject: Re: 2011 League Owner Agreement Wed Feb 16, 2011 8:34 am | |
| - The Czar wrote:
- 2 Catchers? Is this Zara's idea because his other league is catcher challenged and won't let him have a second one? Fetish for squatting men? I could do without the second man in the tools of ignorance myself.
Other than that, I've read the rules and I agree.
The 2 C format is the classic, old-school, original Roto format that originated (same with 5 OF's, FWIW). It's back to the pencil-and-paper, doing-stats-once-a-month-by-hand-with-USA-Today stats page, we-walked-to-school-in-bare-feet/had-zero-electricity days. (Also the same format as used in 2009, too).  | |
|
| | |
Zara
Posts : 48
Join date : 2011-01-12
| | Subject: Re: 2011 League Owner Agreement Wed Feb 16, 2011 11:22 am | |
| - The Czar wrote:
- 2 Catchers? Is this Zara's idea because his other league is catcher challenged and won't let him have a second one? Fetish for squatting men? I could do without the second man in the tools of ignorance myself.
Other than that, I've read the rules and I agree.
Not my idea. In a 12 team league is sort of makes sense. In our other 20 team league, it sort of overvalues catchers. Maybe this "smaller" league will actually give you a chance to compete Mr. Czar.  | |
|
| | |
Timmah
Posts : 62
Join date : 2011-01-16
Location : Philadelphia
| | Subject: Re: 2011 League Owner Agreement Thu Feb 17, 2011 7:35 pm | |
| - Rotoraysfan wrote:
- The Czar wrote:
- 2 Catchers? Is this Zara's idea because his other league is catcher challenged and won't let him have a second one? Fetish for squatting men? I could do without the second man in the tools of ignorance myself.
Other than that, I've read the rules and I agree.
The 2 C format is the classic, old-school, original Roto format that originated (same with 5 OF's, FWIW). It's back to the pencil-and-paper, doing-stats-once-a-month-by-hand-with-USA-Today stats page, we-walked-to-school-in-bare-feet/had-zero-electricity days. Yeah, I remember that. Rick Wilkins and Joe Oliver were my guys in my first year. - Quote :
- (Also the same format as used in 2009, too).
...and then there's that, too. | |
|
| | |
dan
Posts : 36
Join date : 2011-02-16
| | Subject: Re: 2011 League Owner Agreement Sat Feb 19, 2011 6:28 am | |
| | |
|
| | |
The Czar
Posts : 35
Join date : 2011-01-13
| | Subject: Re: 2011 League Owner Agreement Sat Feb 19, 2011 12:58 pm | |
| - Zara wrote:
- The Czar wrote:
- 2 Catchers? Is this Zara's idea because his other league is catcher challenged and won't let him have a second one? Fetish for squatting men? I could do without the second man in the tools of ignorance myself.
Other than that, I've read the rules and I agree.
Not my idea. In a 12 team league is sort of makes sense. In our other 20 team league, it sort of overvalues catchers. Maybe this "smaller" league will actually give you a chance to compete Mr. Czar. Haha. I can hold my own in the bigger leagues. Some of these guys are a little lighter in the pocket book from last season and can vouche for that.  P.S.- Jermaine Dye can rot along with Desmond Jennings. It was like blowing my foot clean off. | |
|
| | |
Miltapalooza
Posts : 5
Join date : 2012-01-24
| | Subject: Re: 2011 League Owner Agreement Sat Jan 28, 2012 10:55 am | |
| | |
|
| | |
Sponsored content
| | Subject: Re: 2011 League Owner Agreement | |
| |
|
| | |
| | 2011 League Owner Agreement | |
|
